Tremper Longman sees Ecclesiastes as written probably by one sage with reference to another sage, Qohelet (not an easy term to translate, so just the transliteration here). Longman says that Qohelet’s words, making up most of the book (1:12-12:7) are framed (“frame narrative”) with a “prologue” (1:1-11) and an “epilogue” (12:8-14), the third person being used descriptive of Qohelet moving to Qohelet’s own words, first person. So that the sage is letting Qohelet speak, then putting Qohelet’s words powerfully in perspective at the end.
We see this in the prologue (1:1-11) that for Qohelet all is utterly meaningless (Longman- not alone- does give a good argument in rendering hebel meaningless, contra Provan and others) under the sun. Next are all of Qohelet’s words, some that are contradictory. Qohelet does seem a bit confused. But overall coherent and clear within his theme.
In the epilogue the sage (meaning wise man, wise person) takes Qohelet to task, then in few words sums up what life is to be for God’s people. He tells us that Qohelet, a sage sought to render with beauty proverbs and words of truth. Longman doesn’t think Qohelet succeeded very well on the first count, and hardly at all on the second. His words end up causing undue pain (nails and goad given by shepherds/sages) in contrast to words that bring comfort along the lines of God’s truth. Indeed there is no let up from the pain Qohelet feels, expressed throughout his “autobiographical speech.” The first sage then warns against excessive writing and study of books, clearly pointing to Qohelet himself. And then closes with his conclusion.
The conclusion is short:
13 Now all has been heard;
here is the conclusion of the matter:
Fear God and keep his commandments,
for this is the [duty] of every human being.14 For God will bring every deed into judgment,
including every hidden thing,
whether it is good or evil.TNIV
Fearing God here is a reverential fear, awe and trust in contrast to Qohelet who Longman sees as viewing fear of God as one who cowers and is afraid. This is because Qohelet sees God as distant and questionable as to his goodness evident in how life plays out under the sun, so that God’s judgment and justice are called into question. And then keeping God’s commandments. We go from a relationship of reverential fear of God, to the outworking of that in our lives: keeping/obeying his commandments. This is the entire duty, what life is all about for us humans. And we need to live in light of God’s judgment, that all that is done, good and evil will be judged by God. Those three things are “the central truths of revealed religion: the fear of God, obedience to his commandments, and an awareness of coming judgment” (284).
As a result life does have meaning, all of life, everything we do. We just don’t eat, drink, and enjoy our labor in a meaningless existence. This is the life of faith. What Qohelet pointed to is how we humans tend to think apart from the revelation given to us from God, or apart from idols we set up for ourselves which in the end leave us empty (idols not mentioned or alluded to in the book, I believe).
For me this makes plenty of sense and I can still read the book with a certain sense of delight, conveying truth to us when, as Longman points out, it is read in light of the rest of Scripture. And the meaninglessness of life under the sun changed through Christ who through taking on himself the curse sets us free to live in God’s new world where earth and heaven are one.