study Jesus, then study the Bible

“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say to you: Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also, and if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, give your coat as well, and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile. Give to the one who asks of you, and do not refuse anyone who wants to borrow from you.

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your Father in heaven, for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers and sisters, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the gentiles do the same? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Matthew 5:38-48; NRSVue

The Bible is a precious, important Book, and I for one value it highly. And the church for centuries has put a premium on it, God’s Word or God’s word pointing us to the Word, Jesus. That said, I believe the Bible is also a dangerous book. I’m referring to Bible thumpers and “hell” raisers. And much that is justified in verses here and there, yet not seen well in the overall arch and narrative even of the Old Testament/ Hebrew Bible alone.

That is why I think we do well to start in the gospel accounts: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, then the rest of the New Testament, and then go through the Old Testament/ Hebrew Bible, and I would add the Apocrypha as well. We need to study Jesus before we study the Bible.

Strictly speaking, Christians are not supposed to be believers in the Bible, but believers in Jesus. If you’re just a believer in the Bible, and really take that astutely serious, you’ll eventually be tied up in knots. There’s no escape from contradictions within the Old Testament, even the Pentateuch (first five books of the Bible) itself. It is all too easy to conveniently gloss over that but use this and that passage to justify what is totally against Jesus and Jesus’s teaching and life.

Genocide is one example, a modern term meaning the extermination of a people group for some alleged important reason, not only with God’s wholehearted approval, but command. But Jesus comes along and practices and teaches entirely otherwise. And instead of God’s wrath being poured out through Jesus on sinful humanity, Jesus takes human wrath on himself and through the cross, through his death, brings God’s promise of new life.

We need to go to Jesus’s teaching. The Sermon on the Mount is a good place to start. I’m not saying we can’t read the Old Testament with the New Testament, or even read the Bible consecutively, in order. But we must learn to read it all in the light of Jesus. God is revealed in Jesus, and in the Old Testament only through Jesus. Otherwise, we’ll easily find ourselves opposed to Jesus.

read with caution

Long ago God spoke to our ancestors in many and various ways by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, through whom he also created the worlds. He is the reflection of God’s glory and the exact imprint of God’s very being, and he sustains all things by his powerful word. When he had made purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, having become as much superior to angels as the name he has inherited is more excellent than theirs.

Hebrews 1:1-4; NRSVue

The Bible is a dangerous book. Christians, even churches, and whole denominations and traditions have justified all kinds of things, we might say by misusing and misreading it. But for one reason or another, their theology was lacking. One example I don’t even want to share here, but it illustrates my point. There was a person in charge of me when I worked for a Christian ministry who suggested that the US should bomb a particular nation based on his reading of Joshua. In no way, shape or form did his thought represent what that good ministry thinks, quite the opposite. But if anyone reads through the entire Bible, you’ll see what I mean. The Bible is indeed a dangerous book.

In various Jewish tradition, Scripture is read discerningly and humanely. God delivers God’s people in the exodus and sets up laws for them which are humane for all, other laws quite beyond the pale of that. While explanations might be given for the brutal, unsparing sentences of stoning in the Hebrew Bible/ Old Testament, it does help to read the entire Old Testament through. Even then, frankly, there’s still a sort of violence that is latent in the text and story, never beyond the possibility of appearing in the name of God. There were then and are now Jewish traditions which mitigate the harshness in the text, finding what might be called more of the humane good. Some Jews and Christians will write that off as being unfaithful to Scripture, to God’s Word, to God. Most Christians would not be explicit, but when it comes right down to it, they are open to accepting violence if not explicitly condoning it.

When Jesus appears we find something quite new, even a radical newness which nevertheless is steeped in the old, a fulfillment of it which given what preceded it (consider the Apocryphal, Deuterocanonical books, as well) is easily a head scratcher since at points it seems to be contradictory and actually is. The heart and soul, spirit of it arguably, and I would say definitely is not. Love for God means love for one’s neighbor, spelling what turns out to be the goal of all Scripture.

Jesus has been aptly called God’s final word. God is seen in Jesus who is indelibly in his nature and life completely like God, so much so that indeed even in Jesus’s humanity, he is God.

Before we as Christians can interpret the meaning of any Scripture passage for our time, we need to run it through God’s word in Jesus. When we do that, we’ll see right away that there are a host of things which not only are not applicable for our time but are actually contradictory to it. One example: the famous Old Testament prophets Elijah and Elisha, fire out of heaven to destroy people, a bear to maul youths mocking the prophet. But Jesus roundly rebukes two of his disciples for suggesting that fire should be called down from heaven to destroy a Samaritan town which refused to receive him. Jesus told them that they didn’t know what spirit they were, since he had come not to destroy people’s lives, but to save them.

Read all of Scripture with profit. But read it discerningly. Each of us need to practice that, but it is best done together in community.

read the Bible through Jesus (not Jesus through the Bible)

Now on that same day two of them were going to a village called Emmaus, about seven miles from Jerusalem, and talking with each other about all these things that had happened. While they were talking and discussing, Jesus himself came near and went with them, but their eyes were kept from recognizing him. And he said to them, “What are you discussing with each other while you walk along?” They stood still, looking sad. Then one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answered him, “Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem who does not know the things that have taken place there in these days?” He asked them, “What things?” They replied, “The things about Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, and how our chief priests and leaders handed him over to be condemned to death and crucified him. But we had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel. Yes, and besides all this, it is now the third day since these things took place. Moreover, some women of our group astounded us. They were at the tomb early this morning, and when they did not find his body there they came back and told us that they had indeed seen a vision of angels who said that he was alive. Some of those who were with us went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said, but they did not see him.” Then he said to them, “Oh, how foolish you are and how slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have declared! Was it not necessary that the Messiah should suffer these things and then enter into his glory?” Then beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them the things about himself in all the scriptures.

As they came near the village to which they were going, he walked ahead as if he were going on. But they urged him strongly, saying, “Stay with us, because it is almost evening and the day is now nearly over.” So he went in to stay with them. When he was at the table with them, he took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. Then their eyes were opened, and they recognized him, and he vanished from their sight. They said to each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he was talking to us on the road, while he was opening the scriptures to us?” That same hour they got up and returned to Jerusalem, and they found the eleven and their companions gathered together. They were saying, “The Lord has risen indeed, and he has appeared to Simon!” Then they told what had happened on the road and how he had been made known to them in the breaking of the bread.

While they were talking about this, Jesus himself stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.” They were startled and terrified and thought that they were seeing a ghost. He said to them, “Why are you frightened, and why do doubts arise in your hearts? Look at my hands and my feet; see that it is I myself. Touch me and see, for a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.” And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and his feet. Yet for all their joy they were still disbelieving and wondering, and he said to them, “Have you anything here to eat?” They gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate in their presence.

Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you—that everything written about me in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms must be fulfilled.” Then he opened their minds to understand the scriptures, and he said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Messiah is to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day and that repentance and forgiveness of sins is to be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. You are witnesses of these things. And see, I am sending upon you what my Father promised, so stay here in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.”

Luke 24:13-49; NRSVue

Of course, any passage is best read in its entirety. I highlight much of the above passage in keeping with the point I want to make here.

Jesus reveals himself and is revealed in the breaking of the bread, we can say in celebrating Communion and more fundamentally related to what Communion is all about, Christ’s body, the church. When we are gathered, Christ is present with us by the Spirit in a way that occurs nowhere else. I cannot receive from another member of Christ when I’m alone, nor can another member of Christ receive from me. The point here is that the meaning of any passage in Scripture is best discerned together.

We don’t understand Jesus through the Bible, but we understand the Bible in light of what the Bible gives us about Jesus. The Holy Spirit accompanies that, both our work together at interpreting Scripture, as well as our witness from that in Christ.

What too often is more or less the case, the Bible is read as if it’s a flat book. We apply sections of it, and I must point out here that this is quite selective, but there are portions of the Old Testament that we take out of context to justify violence, just for one example. Doing that lends itself to misreading places in the New Testament by importing violence into them. An easy example of this is importing the book of Joshua into the book of Revelation. There’s no doubt that we should learn from every page of the book of Joshua. But we have to read Revelation as it is. And essential to that equation, we have to read Jesus as given to us in the four gospel accounts: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, to understand his fulfillment of Scripture, of the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible, as well as properly understand all the Scripture which follows the gospels. When we do, that will cast into question some of what we read in the Old Testament, especially in its meaning for us today.

In the morning and evening prayers in the back of our hymnal, Voices Together (985, 987), we read a Psalm first and interspersed with songs and hymns we have the Gospel reading followed by the Old Testament or Epistle reading. In liturgies of the church, there’s commonly a different order: the Psalm, the Old Testament reading, the Epistle reading, and then the Gospel reading. It’s like the Gospel is always the climax of the readings, and that’s good. But what’s better, at least for our purposes and the point made here is to start with Jesus, the Gospels, and read the rest of Scripture through that understanding. That will save us from calling fire out of heaven on our enemies and help us to find the great good in all of Scripture, all through the eyes and spirit of Jesus.

finding the sweet spot

The heavens are telling the glory of God,
and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.
Day to day pours forth speech,
and night to night declares knowledge.
There is no speech, nor are there words;
their voice is not heard;
yet their voice goes out through all the earth
and their words to the end of the world.

In the heavens he has set a tent for the sun,
which comes out like a bridegroom from his wedding canopy,
and like a strong man runs its course with joy.
Its rising is from the end of the heavens
and its circuit to the end of them,
and nothing is hid from its heat.

The law of the LORD is perfect,
reviving the soul;
the decrees of the LORD are sure,
making wise the simple;
the precepts of the LORD are right,
rejoicing the heart;
the commandment of the LORD is clear,
enlightening the eyes;
the fear of the LORD is pure,
enduring forever;
the ordinances of the LORD are true
and righteous altogether.
More to be desired are they than gold,
even much fine gold;
sweeter also than honey
and drippings of the honeycomb.

Moreover, by them is your servant warned;
in keeping them there is great reward.
But who can detect one’s own errors?
Clear me from hidden faults.
Keep back your servant also from the insolent;
do not let them have dominion over me.
Then I shall be blameless
and innocent of great transgression.

Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart
be acceptable to you,
LORD, my rock and my redeemer.

Psalm 19; NRSVue

Depending on a good number of things, people will find their sweet spot in different places. What do I mean by “sweet spot?” That place where one is most alive, we might say, most themselves, what God intended and intends for them.

This doesn’t mean that when people find this, it makes life easy. Life is what it is, challenging both externally with what happens, and internally with how we process it all. The external challenge seems greater today than at any point in my lifetime. Internally we not only react, but we have to process it in a way that is healthy to ourselves and others. That’s not easy, either, but necessary.

The psalmist lived in difficult times, too. And two places they look: God’s creation, and God’s Word. Somehow they get settled through both. It’s in terms of response as well as finding one’s footing and fulfillment.

I’ve been a Bible person much of my life, I personally don’t think all that good at that, but I’ve stayed in it. If I could do only one thing, I suppose it would be to have Bible in hand, maybe a good study Bible along the way, a cup of coffee, and classical music in the background. One thing I haven’t been consistent at is getting out in nature, in God’s creation. Not enough of that, though I have seen some of it.

Don’t underestimate the power of nature. Just getting out on the beach to enjoy the sand, the vast lake or ocean, the sky in all its glory, the birds, the breeze, the peace that comes with that, can do one a world of good in a short time. And then there’s places where there are trees, marshes, hills, mountains, etc. I’m not a nature guide, but I know there’s nothing like nature to fill one with a sense of awe and wonder, or at least to help ground one in a healthy stillness and peace.

The Bible seems to be an old, crusty, outdated book to many. And it definitely has not only its odd features, but sometimes seems lost itself, at least to me. The only intended way to make sense of it is to see and measure it according to the life, teaching, works, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ. Each part has to be taken seriously on its own, but we have to come to see it all in the light of Jesus as revealed first in the four gospel accounts, and then what follows.*

If one is a novice to the Bible, to start in Genesis and read straight through to Revelation is commendatory, especially if you make it all the way through. I would recommend starting in the gospels. To make it simple, just read it through as it is in our Bibles: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Or maybe in more of a logical order: Mark, Matthew, Luke and John. Mark, Matthew, John, then Luke followed by Acts would be another logical approach. All the rest of Scripture must be seen in the light of those four gospels.

An essential is easily lost in all of this for us who live in an individualistic world. This psalm is actually meant to be read to, or read and heard by God’s people together. We have limited ourselves by making everything an individual endeavor and have lost an untold amount in the process. The appreciation of God’s world and Word is by far best appreciated in community and especially community in and through Jesus. Yes, we need those times alone, too. I highly value some solitude. But Jesus is especially present in the communion of people gathered together in his name. We will be blessed in ways we didn’t recognize at the time, when we make community in Jesus an ongoing priority in our lives.

Where do you find your sweet spot? I don’t think it always has to be in nature and Scripture, though where you find it will be related to both. Nature, we could say includes what comes natural to us, what makes us tick, what we have a knack for and more than interests us.  God’s Word is evident everywhere, if we just develop an ear for it.* In both, extended out in vast, limitless ways, we can find our sweet spot, a continued endeavor from the gift of God.

*Nonviolent Word: Anabaptism, the Bible, and the Grain of the Universe, by J. Denny Weaver and Gerald J. Mast

note, too, related to this post, The Strange New World Within the Bible, a sermon by Karl Barth which he delivered in 1917

the gap between hearing and doing

But be doers of the word and not merely hearers who deceive themselves.

James 1:22; NRSVue

Some read from the scrolls, but mostly in the time when James was written, God’s people heard God’s Word being read. In fact, that was more or less the case until the invention of the printing press when Bibles began to be more available, only in Protestant or other sects for a time. The usual best-case scenario was to hear Scripture read and a message, the gospel somehow in that, unless through poor teaching it was all but lost.

Today there’s no end to the resources we have to hear and read Scripture. It’s an embarrassment of riches where I live, and that may be good. It’s interesting how peoples and Christians are so hungry for God’s Word in places where Scripture is less available, even limited. Like a famine in their hearts and they’re more than ready to take it in, to hear and read it for themselves, to meditate and soak in it, and that’s all good. Just as James says just previous to the verse above:

rid yourselves of all sordidness and rank growth of wickedness, and welcome with meekness the implanted word that has the power to save your souls.

James 1:21; NRSVue

But as James says immediately afterwards, though that is important and great, even to the saving of our souls, we can still deceive ourselves if we fail to follow through by doing the word.

And we can’t pick and choose in this. We have to take seriously the whole Word, not just the parts we might resonate with, not only the “precious promises,” as encouraging and important as they are. One might start by reading and meditating on the entire book of James, not that long. Read it through and pray, that God would help in both understanding and practicing it.

Hearing/reading and doing the word involves a process. It’s not just something we read then do and check off as if it’s done. We’re to grow into this as those who hold to the faith of Jesus (James 2:1), so that we’re becoming increasingly sensitive and passionate to both hearing God’s word and doing it. Central to our call as community and from that as individuals in our following of Jesus.

how one’s condition affects one’s reading and understanding of Scripture

Let the brother or sister of humble means boast in having a high position and the rich in having been humbled, because the rich will disappear like a flower in the field. For the sun rises with its scorching heat and withers the field; its flower falls, and its beauty perishes. It is the same way with the rich; in the midst of a busy life, they will wither away.

James 1:9-11; NRSVue

Brothers and sisters who are poor should find satisfaction in their high status. Those who are wealthy should find satisfaction in their low status, because they will die off like wildflowers. The sun rises with its scorching heat and dries up the grass so that its flowers fall and its beauty is lost. Just like that, in the midst of their daily lives, the wealthy will waste away.

James 1:9-11; CEB

I’m wondering what the difference was in the reading and understanding of Scripture and in theology, pre and post-Constantinian. Also, the difference between slaves and masters in the US south. For that matter, the difference everywhere between the haves and the have-nots, those in the lap of luxury or with no real economic concerns and those who are struggling to survive or perhaps out in the streets.

It seems to me that the Bible is written largely to peoples who are struggling: in exile, poor, marginalized, definitely not among the world’s elite or celebrated. Naturally when those read it who are well off on earth, they’ll think of heaven, and that’s it, maybe also thinking they’re among the blessed of God because of their status on earth. Of course, the Bible talks of heaven. Those who are not well off on earth will think about heaven, yes, but they’ll also think about earth in terms of justice, God’s care. They will see themes like the exodus and redemption not just in terms of the life to come, but of this life as well. It’s interesting that a good portion of the Bible, a large part of the Old Testament and carried on into the New Testament is written from the perspective of exile.

There are theologies which have either downplayed or all but ignored life in the present on earth. Everything is about heaven, a heavenly existence. Early dispensationalism is one example in which the church was considered heavenly but not earthly in any way that mattered. That kind of thinking would tell those in apartheid, or peoples like the Palestinians or any other oppressed people that God’s good news means nothing at all with reference to their present plight. Not directly, but by implication, since it would say next to nothing about it, except to give gifts so that such can hear the gospel, believe and go to heaven someday.

The point of this post is something of what James is getting at. Those who are struggling to make ends meet in this world will naturally read the Bible from that perspective, within that experience. And that’s largely the viewpoint of its writing. Jesus blesses the poor and warns the rich. Yes, there’s great comfort in the promise of a better, just, flourishing life to come. But if the Bible has nothing to say about the here and now, then it needs to be seen as a different book than what it actually is. Something perhaps more akin to a spirituality or mentality which brushes off reality and the material world for some kind of spirituality which actually is foreign to Scripture. Spirituality is concerned with materiality in Scripture.

A difference is that the poor, oppressed, marginalized, despised will see things in Scripture that those in power and privilege will not. Those on top need to learn to see the perspective of those on the bottom. And somehow learn to live more from that standpoint.

God wants all at Christ’s table: the poor along with the rich, the haves and the have-nots, the supposed power brokers and those who are denied such. But at that table an equity will be emerging, that of the life to come breaking into the present life.

all *will* be well (in spite of anything and everything)

I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb. And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God is its light, and its lamp is the Lamb. The nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it. Its gates will never be shut by day—and there will be no night there. People will bring into it the glory and the honor of the nations. But nothing unclean will enter it, nor anyone who practices abomination or falsehood, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s book of life.

Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb through the middle of the street of the city. On either side of the river is the tree of life with its twelve kinds of fruit, producing its fruit each month, and the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. Nothing accursed will be found there any more. But the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and his servants will worship him; they will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads. And there will be no more night; they need no light of lamp or sun, for the Lord God will be their light, and they will reign forever and ever.

Revelation 21:22-22:5; NRSVue

All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well.

Julian of Norwich

There are many reasons today to laugh and cry in despair. For one’s mental health and more importantly as a people of Christian faith to properly follow Jesus, one has to let go of so much. And that isn’t easy considering that the source of so much trouble comes from the religious even “Christian” in name side. Yes, we shouldn’t go there. But we can’t just put our heads in the sand and ignore reality.

Revelation is written for such times as these, probably originally written for a church that was under stress and duress, much of the church caving into idolatrous influences. What was true for that day is every bit as true today, one might say in spades except what was a huge issue then is actually crucial at any time. Times like these only accentuate that point.

What we need to keep our head wrapped around is the point that Julian of Norwich made from the distress in which she lived. And it came out of the revelation of God to her, a God who is out and out and forever love. There are many things on any number of levels which not only are troubling to us but can feel downright threatening, in fact may well indeed be so. But because of God’s love, we can be well assured that it will all work out and everything will be right and good in the end.

But the book of Revelation is not some saccharine sweet, nice fairy tell book with a happily ever after ending, though it does end on a wonderfully promising, indeed climactic note. Given the total failure of even so-called Bible teachers and traditions in the catastrophic interpretations of Revelation which really amount to a misreading, even a blatant anti-reading of Revelation in which the book is supposedly read literally, but definitely not taken seriously, we end up with a book of little help. People who are influenced by that popular rendition simply are looking for signs of the end, finding them everywhere and emboldened to take stands on the basis of such which have nothing to do with the heart or body of Revelation at all. And we’re living with the fallout and result of that right now.

I think it makes a good point to say about the Bible: for mature audiences only, maybe give it some sort of rating. In spite of that, as long as we get at the point being made, that God is at work in the royal mess of which we share some responsibility, as long as we see that in the end all will be well not according to what we think we’ve figured out, but according to God’s good will in Christ, that can go a long ways in helping us be okay in the here and now. And a sure sign that we’re on a good and if need be correctable track is when our hearts especially together are intent on just one thing: following the Lamb wherever he goes (Revelation 14), lamblike ourselves for the good of ourselves and all others in anticipation of that final great good in the end.

the failure of spiritualizing passages, like the rich man and Lazarus

“There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day. And at his gate lay a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who longed to satisfy his hunger with what fell from the rich man’s table; even the dogs would come and lick his sores. The poor man died and was carried away by the angels to be with Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried. In Hades, where he was being tormented, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham far away with Lazarus by his side. He called out, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am in agony in these flames.’ But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that during your lifetime you received your good things and Lazarus in like manner evil things, but now he is comforted here, and you are in agony. Besides all this, between you and us a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who might want to pass from here to you cannot do so, and no one can cross from there to us.’ He said, ‘Then I beg you, father, to send him to my father’s house— for I have five brothers—that he may warn them, so that they will not also come into this place of torment.’ Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them.’ He said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’ ”

Luke 16:19-31; NRSVue

The moral character of Lazarus is passed over to illustrate the fatal deficiency in the life of the indifferent rich man and the impossibility of altering his condemnation.

The New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha, New Revised Standard Version, 1861

I remember when I was a young Christian and visiting various churches, that when visiting what I supposed to be a liberal (maybe quite liberal in my mind) either United Church of Christ or I think United Methodist rural church, I confronted the pastor afterwards concerning his message on the above passage. I was bringing out the cross, the need for faith in Christ, something to that effect, asking him how the cross fit into his message. As I recall, he was fairly young, and my recollection is that he was polite and had nothing to say. But actually, the passage itself has nothing to say about hitting the sawdust trail to receive Christ.

Yes, there are liberal traditions which to this day see the Bible as an important religious book but not in any way, the Word of God. And even while they may accept that it has something important to say to us today, usually an emphasis on faith in Christ is all but lost to find universal axioms everyone would agree with.

But then there’s the Evangelical tradition of which I was a part of for many years. You can’t lump them all together, but by and large, the popular understanding of the above passage is that, while it may be a parable, and not to be taken completely literally, though undoubtedly some would, and question that it is a parable, by and large like so many passages, it will be spiritualized.

What I mean by spiritualized is something like the following. The details or specifics are more or less completely set aside to get to the ever-main point: Jesus died for our sins, we can do nothing at all except accept that provision of God, believe and receive eternal life. Something to that effect.

But what is Jesus telling us from that passage? The same thing he has been saying elsewhere in different ways. We can’t serve God and Mammon/money. That money matters, whether we love it and see it as something to hoard to protect us, maybe to live in the lap of luxury, or something to help others along with meeting our own needs.

To take the actual teeth out of this passage is to make it something it isn’t as well as failing to understand the context in which Jesus was speaking. Yes, he had no intention of being the Bread-King (John 6) and they and us need indeed to learn to feed on him by faith. That is not to be taken literally, but spiritually, but yes, we take it in all seriousness.

But that doesn’t for a moment put into question Jesus’s warnings to the rich and blessing to the poor (Luke 6). Jesus* is the answer, but in that answer, we see a completely different economy than what the world practices. What was going on in Jesus’s day with the Romans and Palestine is no different than what is going on in the United States today. But in part, because so many of us have spiritualized such passages, even though we name the name of Christ, don’t we end up participating in something of the same as the rich man in Jesus’s story?

*And God’s reign and dominion in him.

God: loving or angry or what?

Philip said to him, “Lord, show us the Father, and we will be satisfied.” Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and you still do not know me? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, but if you do not, then believe because of the works themselves.

John 14:1-14; NRSVue

If you look at the Biblical text, there’s no doubt that the God depicted there will give you a jolt at a good number of places. The idea that God is above emotion and lives in some sort of existence beyond it all really does not seem to be borne out at all in Scripture. God is often angry and acts on that anger. God threatens retributive judgment again and again. But thankfully, that’s not the end of the story that we see in the Bible.

The God who is called love (1 John 4) can’t seem to help God’s self in relenting and bringing back into blessing the very people God condemned before. We see this in the storyline, only if we consider the entire Bible from cover to cover. In one book God speaks of annihilating the entire earth. But in Revelation we have the picture of the kings of the earth streaming into the New Jerusalem and the leaves of the tree of life being for the healing of the nations. Might God’s anger be an expression of God’s love? I think that is unquestionably the case.

We see God fully, finally and completely in Jesus. God took on God’s self our full humanity and paradoxically suffered death itself at human hands to bring all of humankind, indeed all of creation into the new creation now present and to someday be total in Christ. We see God in Christ. And we need to read the Bible, taking all the hard parts seriously, but with that in mind. That vision can help us towards correcting our wrong views of God. God suffers with humankind and while it seems so much is lost because of the inhumanity of humans, God thankfully gets the final word coming with judgment and the salvation which follows. And it is now and always will be from a God who is love through and through.

when unity, including Christian unity is empty

For, to begin with, when you come together as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you, and to some extent I believe it. Indeed, there have to be factions among you, for only so will it become clear who among you are genuine.

1 Corinthians 11:18-19; NRSVue

When the wealthy, privileged members of the Corinthian church we’re living it up even at the Lord’s table at the expense of the poor who came in late because of their work/jobs, along with a number of other issues between the rich and the poor in that setting, whatever unity would have been maintained would have been a farce, empty. On top of that was a penchant for division (1 Corinthians 1). But what if everyone in that situation would have just had to agree to live with all of that, to be united in the midst of all those differences, to get along in spite of the rich eating most of the meal and more or less drunk, all of that before the poor arrived? What if the poor just had to look past all of that?

Unity is a good ideal, but it all depends on what you mean. People might unite in spite of differences for some common cause only to disband later. The kind of unity Christ calls for is different. Yes, we sometimes have to put up with each other, true in every human relationship. But the kind of unity Christ calls for might very well mean division. Remember when Jesus taught that he had not come to bring peace, but a sword (Matthew 10:34-39)? He wasn’t speaking of an actual, literal sword, but of the inevitable divisions which come from following him, even in one’s family, dare I say, even church family? Jesus said that his true family were those who do God’s will (Mark 3:31-35).

Who did Jesus sit with often incurring the rebuke of the ones who had affluence and power? The disenfranchised, the despised. Those on the margins and outside of the boundaries of accepted society. Is it any different today?

The church rejects certain people. In the past those who were black who could not enter white Bible kind of church assemblies. In the present queer people who believe and want to follow Christ. The Spirit seems to be evidently working in their lives as much or more than any of the rest of us, yet they are held at arm’s length, not really fully included. Because the Bible tells them so, they say. In that case as in days of old, we would argue that Jesus draws a line. We have to agree to disagree. And most importantly, we have to quit holding on to a unity which is not real and certainly not practical. Or go ahead and keep pretending at the expense of those on the bottom who really are not full participants, not fully included no matter what.

Unity is not real or good if it’s merely unity for unity’s sake. It has to be an “in Christ” unity of the Spirit which refuses to budge from Jesus’s priorities. And yes, the other side will argue with their finger pointing at Scripture, both sides, actually (see the excellent exegetical work of Luke Timothy Johnson, etc.). There’s no use pretending and holding on to something that isn’t real. Believers can amicably part.

The basic thought here is derived from How to Have an Enemy: Righteous Anger and the Work of Peace, by Melissa Florer-Bixler. My understanding of what she is saying in that book, which resonates with me.